AI Resilience Scorecard

Rate how resilient an organisation is if it had to switch, replace or lose an AI vendor — across six dimensions. Works whether you rely on one AI tool or several. The score updates as you go.

Free self-assessment · answers stay in your browser
0–1 Red 2–3 Amber 4–5 Green Higher = more resilient

Contingency playbook template

For each critical AI tool, capture one entry. This is the Phase 2 artifact that turns a low Contingency score into a tested plan.

Tool / capabilityThe AI tool or vendor this entry covers
What depends on itAgents, scripts, workflows, integrations at risk if it goes
Alternative(s)Where we would go instead, and how close a match
Migration effortS / M / L — rough size and time to move
Migration riskWhat could break, degrade, or need re-testing
TriggerThe event that makes us actually move (e.g. end-of-life, price rise, renewal)

Worked example

Tool: Agent studio (drag-and-drop builder)

Depends on it: Customer-service & recommendation agents

Alternative: Rebuild on an open framework, or a competing studio (weaker match)

Effort: L — proprietary features, closer to a rebuild

Risk: Behaviour drift; recommendation quality dip in transition

Trigger: End-of-life, price rise >30%, or contract renewal